Processing jobs get a higher priority over native imaging jobs in the queue. True or False?

In the context of the queue management system within Relativity, processing jobs and native imaging jobs have distinct roles. Processing jobs typically involve more complex operations, such as data analysis, transformation, or extraction. These jobs often require significant resources and time, which can impact the overall efficiency and performance of the entire workflow.

Native imaging jobs, on the other hand, primarily focus on converting files into a reviewable format, which is generally a less resource-intensive task compared to the processing jobs. As a result, native imaging jobs are usually assigned a lower priority in the queue compared to processing jobs. This allows for more urgent and resource-demanding processing tasks to be completed in a timely manner, enhancing the effectiveness of the workflow overall.

Thus, stating that processing jobs get a higher priority over native imaging jobs accurately reflects how job prioritization is structured in Relativity’s queue management system, leading to the assertion that the answer is false.